2005 GMC Safari vs. 2011 Ford Explorer
To start off, 2011 Ford Explorer is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 GMC Safari. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 GMC Safari would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 GMC Safari is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford Explorer (290 HP) has 100 more horse power than 2005 GMC Safari. (190 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford Explorer should accelerate faster than 2005 GMC Safari.
Because 2005 GMC Safari is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Ford Explorer. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 GMC Safari will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Ford Explorer (345 Nm) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 GMC Safari. (339 Nm). This means 2011 Ford Explorer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 GMC Safari.
Compare all specifications:
2005 GMC Safari | 2011 Ford Explorer | |
Make | GMC | Ford |
Model | Safari | Explorer |
Year Released | 2005 | 2011 |
Body Type | Van | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 290 HP |
Torque | 339 Nm | 345 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 5006 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 2004 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1788 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 14 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 17 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 102 L | 70 L |