2005 GMC Savana vs. 2008 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 GMC Savana. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 GMC Savana would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 GMC Savana is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 GMC Savana (195 HP) has 19 more horse power than 2008 Land Rover Range Rover. (176 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 GMC Savana should accelerate faster than 2008 Land Rover Range Rover. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 170 kg more than 2005 GMC Savana.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover (390 Nm) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 GMC Savana. (353 Nm). This means 2008 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 GMC Savana.
Compare all specifications:
2005 GMC Savana | 2008 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | GMC | Land Rover |
Model | Savana | Range Rover |
Year Released | 2005 | 2008 |
Body Type | Van | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4293 cc | 2926 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 195 HP | 176 HP |
Torque | 353 Nm | 390 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 102 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 18.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2330 kg | 2500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 2200 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2080 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3440 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.8 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 100 L |