2005 GMC Savana vs. 2010 Audi R8
To start off, 2010 Audi R8 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 GMC Savana. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 GMC Savana would be higher. At 5,200 cc (10 cylinders), 2010 Audi R8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Audi R8 (525 HP) has 330 more horse power than 2005 GMC Savana. (195 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Audi R8 should accelerate faster than 2005 GMC Savana. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 GMC Savana weights approximately 710 kg more than 2010 Audi R8.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Audi R8 (530 Nm) has 177 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 GMC Savana. (353 Nm). This means 2010 Audi R8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 GMC Savana.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 GMC Savana | 2010 Audi R8 | |
| Make | GMC | Audi |
| Model | Savana | R8 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Van | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 4293 cc | 5200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 195 HP | 525 HP |
| Torque | 353 Nm | 530 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2330 kg | 1620 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4435 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1930 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2080 mm | 1252 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3440 mm | 2649 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 19.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 90 L |
