2005 GMC Savana vs. 2012 Ford Expedition
To start off, 2012 Ford Expedition is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 GMC Savana. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 GMC Savana would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Ford Expedition is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford Expedition (310 HP) has 115 more horse power than 2005 GMC Savana. (195 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford Expedition should accelerate faster than 2005 GMC Savana. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford Expedition weights approximately 321 kg more than 2005 GMC Savana. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford Expedition (494 Nm) has 141 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 GMC Savana. (353 Nm). This means 2012 Ford Expedition will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 GMC Savana.
Compare all specifications:
2005 GMC Savana | 2012 Ford Expedition | |
Make | GMC | Ford |
Model | Savana | Expedition |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Body Type | Van | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4293 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 195 HP | 310 HP |
Torque | 353 Nm | 494 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2330 kg | 2651 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 5621 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 2002 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2080 mm | 1974 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3440 mm | 3327 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 127 L |