2005 GMC Savana vs. 2012 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2012 Volvo XC90 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 GMC Savana. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 GMC Savana would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 GMC Savana is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Volvo XC90 (240 HP) has 45 more horse power than 2005 GMC Savana. (195 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 2005 GMC Savana. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 GMC Savana weights approximately 175 kg more than 2012 Volvo XC90.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 GMC Savana (353 Nm) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Volvo XC90. (320 Nm). This means 2005 GMC Savana will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Volvo XC90.
Compare all specifications:
2005 GMC Savana | 2012 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | GMC | Volvo |
Model | Savana | XC90 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Body Type | Van | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4293 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 195 HP | 240 HP |
Torque | 353 Nm | 320 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2330 kg | 2155 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4808 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1897 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2080 mm | 1783 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3440 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 80 L |