2005 GMC Savana vs. 2013 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2013 Volvo XC60 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 GMC Savana. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 GMC Savana would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 GMC Savana is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo XC60 (296 HP) has 101 more horse power than 2005 GMC Savana. (195 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo XC60 should accelerate faster than 2005 GMC Savana. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 GMC Savana weights approximately 412 kg more than 2013 Volvo XC60.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Volvo XC60 (441 Nm) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 GMC Savana. (353 Nm). This means 2013 Volvo XC60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 GMC Savana.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 GMC Savana | 2013 Volvo XC60 | |
| Make | GMC | Volvo |
| Model | Savana | XC60 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Van | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4293 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 6 valves |
| Horse Power | 195 HP | 296 HP |
| Torque | 353 Nm | 441 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 102 mm | 82 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 93 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2330 kg | 1918 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4627 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1891 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2080 mm | 1713 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3440 mm | 2774 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 8.5 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 12.1 L/100km |
