2005 GMC Sierra vs. 1964 Lotus Elan
To start off, 2005 GMC Sierra is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 5,359 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 GMC Sierra (295 HP) has 191 more horse power than 1964 Lotus Elan. (104 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 GMC Sierra should accelerate faster than 1964 Lotus Elan.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 GMC Sierra | 1964 Lotus Elan | |
| Make | GMC | Lotus |
| Model | Sierra | Elan |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1964 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5359 cc | 1558 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 295 HP | 104 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5850 mm | 3700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1430 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1150 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3650 mm | 2140 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 45 L |
