2005 GMC Sierra vs. 1964 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2005 GMC Sierra is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 4,802 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 GMC Sierra (285 HP) has 196 more horse power than 1964 Triumph 2000. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 GMC Sierra should accelerate faster than 1964 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 GMC Sierra weights approximately 990 kg more than 1964 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 GMC Sierra (400 Nm) has 242 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm). This means 2005 GMC Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 GMC Sierra | 1964 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | GMC | Triumph |
| Model | Sierra | 2000 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4802 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 285 HP | 89 HP |
| Torque | 400 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 74.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 76 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.3:1 |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2160 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5710 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3380 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 129 L | 64 L |
