2005 GMC Sierra vs. 1966 Holden EH
To start off, 2005 GMC Sierra is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden EH. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden EH would be higher. At 5,359 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 GMC Sierra (295 HP) has 195 more horse power than 1966 Holden EH. (100 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 GMC Sierra should accelerate faster than 1966 Holden EH. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 GMC Sierra weights approximately 1130 kg more than 1966 Holden EH. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 GMC Sierra (454 Nm) has 217 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Holden EH. (237 Nm). This means 2005 GMC Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Holden EH.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 GMC Sierra | 1966 Holden EH | |
| Make | GMC | Holden |
| Model | Sierra | EH |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5359 cc | 2930 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 295 HP | 100 HP |
| Torque | 454 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2315 kg | 1185 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5850 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3650 mm | 2680 mm |
