2005 GMC Sierra vs. 1968 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2005 GMC Sierra is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 5,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 GMC Sierra (300 HP) has 211 more horse power than 1968 Triumph 2000. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 GMC Sierra should accelerate faster than 1968 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 GMC Sierra weights approximately 1420 kg more than 1968 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 GMC Sierra (488 Nm) has 330 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm). This means 2005 GMC Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2005 GMC Sierra | 1968 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | GMC | Triumph |
Model | Sierra | 2000 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5965 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 89 HP |
Torque | 488 Nm | 158 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 9.3:1 |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2590 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 6030 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1960 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3890 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 64 L |