2005 GMC Sierra vs. 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2005 GMC Sierra is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 7,462 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 GMC Sierra (300 HP) has 52 more horse power than 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (248 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 GMC Sierra should accelerate faster than 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 GMC Sierra weights approximately 988 kg more than 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass (502 Nm) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 GMC Sierra. (488 Nm). This means 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 GMC Sierra.
Compare all specifications:
2005 GMC Sierra | 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | GMC | Oldsmobile |
Model | Sierra | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2005 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5965 cc | 7462 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 248 HP |
Torque | 488 Nm | 502 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2788 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 6270 mm | 5270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2450 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 4010 mm | 2850 mm |