2005 GMC Sierra vs. 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2005 GMC Sierra is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 5,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 GMC Sierra (300 HP) has 180 more horse power than 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (120 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 GMC Sierra should accelerate faster than 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 GMC Sierra weights approximately 1388 kg more than 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 GMC Sierra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 GMC Sierra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 GMC Sierra (488 Nm) has 183 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (305 Nm). This means 2005 GMC Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Compare all specifications:
2005 GMC Sierra | 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | GMC | Oldsmobile |
Model | Sierra | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2005 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5965 cc | 4343 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 120 HP |
Torque | 488 Nm | 305 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2874 kg | 1486 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 4250 mm | 2750 mm |