2005 GMC Sierra vs. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2005 GMC Sierra is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 4,802 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 GMC Sierra weights approximately 834 kg more than 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2005 GMC Sierra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 GMC Sierra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 GMC Sierra | 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | GMC | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Sierra | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4802 cc | 2260 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 285 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2160 kg | 1326 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5710 mm | 4850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3380 mm | 2680 mm |
