2005 GMC Sierra vs. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2005 GMC Sierra is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 4,802 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 GMC Sierra weights approximately 678 kg more than 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 GMC Sierra | 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | GMC | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Sierra | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4802 cc | 3790 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 285 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2160 kg | 1482 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5710 mm | 5030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3380 mm | 2760 mm |
