2005 GMC Sierra vs. 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2005 GMC Sierra is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 5,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 GMC Sierra weights approximately 1249 kg more than 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2005 GMC Sierra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 GMC Sierra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 GMC Sierra | 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | GMC | Oldsmobile |
Model | Sierra | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2005 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5965 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2569 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Length | 6270 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 4010 mm | 2680 mm |