2005 GMC Sierra vs. 2002 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2005 GMC Sierra is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 MCC Crossblade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 MCC Crossblade would be higher. At 5,359 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 GMC Sierra (295 HP) has 225 more horse power than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 GMC Sierra should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 GMC Sierra weights approximately 1575 kg more than 2002 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 GMC Sierra (454 Nm) has 352 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm). This means 2005 GMC Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 GMC Sierra | 2002 MCC Crossblade | |
| Make | GMC | MCC |
| Model | Sierra | Crossblade |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2002 |
| Engine Size | 5359 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 295 HP | 70 HP |
| Torque | 454 Nm | 102 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2315 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5850 mm | 2630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3650 mm | 1810 mm |
