2005 GMC Sierra vs. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2005 GMC Sierra is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 5,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 GMC Sierra (300 HP) has 105 more horse power than 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (195 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 GMC Sierra should accelerate faster than 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 GMC Sierra weights approximately 769 kg more than 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 GMC Sierra (489 Nm) has 177 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (312 Nm). This means 2005 GMC Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
2005 GMC Sierra | 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | GMC | Jeep |
Model | Sierra | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 2005 | 2003 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5965 cc | 3966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 195 HP |
Torque | 489 Nm | 312 Nm |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2569 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 6270 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 4010 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 129 L | 78 L |