2005 GMC Sierra vs. 2008 Mercedes-Benz C
To start off, 2008 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 GMC Sierra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 GMC Sierra would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 GMC Sierra weights approximately 933 kg more than 2008 Mercedes-Benz C.
Because 2005 GMC Sierra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Mercedes-Benz C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 GMC Sierra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 GMC Sierra (454 Nm) has 204 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mercedes-Benz C. (250 Nm). This means 2005 GMC Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mercedes-Benz C.
Compare all specifications:
2005 GMC Sierra | 2008 Mercedes-Benz C | |
Make | GMC | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Sierra | C |
Year Released | 2005 | 2008 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 295 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 454 Nm | 250 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 85 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2423 kg | 1490 kg |
Vehicle Length | 6330 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1880 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 4010 mm | 2770 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 7.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 129 L | 66 L |