2005 GMC Sierra vs. 2010 Lotus Evora
To start off, 2010 Lotus Evora is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 GMC Sierra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 GMC Sierra would be higher. At 5,359 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Lotus Evora (400 HP) has 105 more horse power than 2005 GMC Sierra. (295 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Lotus Evora should accelerate faster than 2005 GMC Sierra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 GMC Sierra weights approximately 324 kg more than 2010 Lotus Evora.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Lotus Evora (459 Nm) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 GMC Sierra. (454 Nm). This means 2010 Lotus Evora will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 GMC Sierra.
Compare all specifications:
2005 GMC Sierra | 2010 Lotus Evora | |
Make | GMC | Lotus |
Model | Sierra | Evora |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 5359 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 295 HP | 400 HP |
Torque | 454 Nm | 459 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2315 kg | 1991 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5850 mm | 5098 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1895 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1438 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3650 mm | 3063 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 11.2 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 21.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 90 L |