2005 GMC Sierra vs. 2010 Volvo C30
To start off, 2010 Volvo C30 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 GMC Sierra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 GMC Sierra would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 GMC Sierra weights approximately 864 kg more than 2010 Volvo C30.
Because 2005 GMC Sierra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 GMC Sierra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 GMC Sierra (454 Nm) has 104 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Volvo C30. (350 Nm). This means 2005 GMC Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Volvo C30.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 GMC Sierra | 2010 Volvo C30 | |
| Make | GMC | Volvo |
| Model | Sierra | C30 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 295 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 454 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2315 kg | 1451 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5850 mm | 4252 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1783 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1448 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3650 mm | 2639 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 60 L |
