2005 GMC Sierra vs. 2011 Ford E-150
To start off, 2011 Ford E-150 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 GMC Sierra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 GMC Sierra would be higher. At 5,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 GMC Sierra (300 HP) has 75 more horse power than 2011 Ford E-150. (225 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 GMC Sierra should accelerate faster than 2011 Ford E-150. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Ford E-150 weights approximately 21 kg more than 2005 GMC Sierra.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 GMC Sierra (488 Nm) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Ford E-150. (387 Nm). This means 2005 GMC Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Ford E-150.
Compare all specifications:
2005 GMC Sierra | 2011 Ford E-150 | |
Make | GMC | Ford |
Model | Sierra | E-150 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2011 |
Body Type | Pickup | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5965 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 225 HP |
Torque | 488 Nm | 387 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2590 kg | 2611 kg |
Vehicle Length | 6030 mm | 5504 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 2017 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1960 mm | 2085 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3890 mm | 3505 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 12.4 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 18.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 125 L |