2005 GMC Sierra vs. 2011 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2011 Holden Commodore is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 GMC Sierra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 GMC Sierra would be higher. At 4,802 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 GMC Sierra (285 HP) has 45 more horse power than 2011 Holden Commodore. (240 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 GMC Sierra should accelerate faster than 2011 Holden Commodore.
Because 2005 GMC Sierra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Holden Commodore. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 GMC Sierra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 GMC Sierra (400 Nm) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Holden Commodore. (240 Nm). This means 2005 GMC Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Holden Commodore.
Compare all specifications:
2005 GMC Sierra | 2011 Holden Commodore | |
Make | GMC | Holden |
Model | Sierra | Commodore |
Year Released | 2005 | 2011 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4802 cc | 2564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 285 HP | 240 HP |
Torque | 400 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.8 L/100km | 10.9 L/100km |