2005 GMC Sierra vs. 2012 Cadillac CTS-V

To start off, 2012 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 GMC Sierra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 GMC Sierra would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Cadillac CTS-V (556 HP) has 255 more horse power than 2005 GMC Sierra. (301 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 2005 GMC Sierra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 GMC Sierra weights approximately 763 kg more than 2012 Cadillac CTS-V.

Because 2005 GMC Sierra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Cadillac CTS-V. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 GMC Sierra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Cadillac CTS-V (746 Nm) has 258 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 GMC Sierra. (488 Nm). This means 2012 Cadillac CTS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 GMC Sierra.

Compare all specifications:

2005 GMC Sierra 2012 Cadillac CTS-V
Make GMC Cadillac
Model Sierra CTS-V
Year Released 2005 2012
Body Type Pickup Station Wagon
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5965 cc 6200 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 301 HP 556 HP
Torque 488 Nm 746 Nm
Drive Type 4WD Rear
Number of Seats 3 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 2678 kg 1915 kg
Vehicle Length 5650 mm 4877 mm
Vehicle Width 2450 mm 1842 mm
Vehicle Height 1950 mm 1473 mm
Wheelbase Size 3380 mm 2880 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 129 L 68 L