2005 GMC Sierra vs. 2012 Ford Ka
To start off, 2012 Ford Ka is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 GMC Sierra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 GMC Sierra would be higher. At 5,359 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 GMC Sierra (295 HP) has 227 more horse power than 2012 Ford Ka. (68 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 GMC Sierra should accelerate faster than 2012 Ford Ka.
Because 2005 GMC Sierra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Ford Ka. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 GMC Sierra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 GMC Sierra (454 Nm) has 348 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Ford Ka. (106 Nm). This means 2005 GMC Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
2005 GMC Sierra | 2012 Ford Ka | |
Make | GMC | Ford |
Model | Sierra | Ka |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5359 cc | 1297 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 295 HP | 68 HP |
Torque | 454 Nm | 106 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 74.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 75.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.2:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 6330 mm | 3630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1880 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 4010 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 6.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 129 L | 40 L |