2005 GMC Sierra vs. 2012 Volvo S60
To start off, 2012 Volvo S60 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 GMC Sierra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 GMC Sierra would be higher. At 4,802 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 GMC Sierra (285 HP) has 105 more horse power than 2012 Volvo S60. (180 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 GMC Sierra should accelerate faster than 2012 Volvo S60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 GMC Sierra weights approximately 551 kg more than 2012 Volvo S60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 GMC Sierra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 GMC Sierra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo S60, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 GMC Sierra | 2012 Volvo S60 | |
Make | GMC | Volvo |
Model | Sierra | S60 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4802 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 285 HP | 180 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2160 kg | 1609 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5710 mm | 4628 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1864 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1483 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3380 mm | 2776 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 129 L | 67 L |