2005 GMC Sierra vs. 2013 Acura TL
To start off, 2013 Acura TL is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 GMC Sierra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 GMC Sierra would be higher. At 4,802 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Acura TL (305 HP) has 20 more horse power than 2005 GMC Sierra. (285 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 2005 GMC Sierra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 GMC Sierra weights approximately 360 kg more than 2013 Acura TL.
Because 2013 Acura TL is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 GMC Sierra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Acura TL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 GMC Sierra (400 Nm) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Acura TL. (370 Nm). This means 2005 GMC Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Acura TL.
Compare all specifications:
2005 GMC Sierra | 2013 Acura TL | |
Make | GMC | Acura |
Model | Sierra | TL |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4802 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 285 HP | 305 HP |
Torque | 400 Nm | 370 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 96 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2160 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5710 mm | 4928 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 2118 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1452 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3380 mm | 2775 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.2 L/100km | 9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 129 L | 70 L |