2005 GMC Sierra vs. 2013 Mini Roadster
To start off, 2013 Mini Roadster is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 GMC Sierra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 GMC Sierra would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 GMC Sierra weights approximately 1072 kg more than 2013 Mini Roadster.
Because 2005 GMC Sierra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Mini Roadster. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 GMC Sierra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 GMC Sierra (400 Nm) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Roadster. (260 Nm). This means 2005 GMC Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Roadster.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 GMC Sierra | 2013 Mini Roadster | |
| Make | GMC | Mini |
| Model | Sierra | Roadster |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Roadster |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 285 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 400 Nm | 260 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 96.1 mm | 77 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 85 mm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2317 kg | 1245 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5710 mm | 3734 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1892 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1880 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3380 mm | 2467 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 5.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 129 L | 50 L |
