2005 GMC Yukon vs. 1968 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2005 GMC Yukon is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 5,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 GMC Yukon (336 HP) has 247 more horse power than 1968 Triumph 2000. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 GMC Yukon should accelerate faster than 1968 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 GMC Yukon weights approximately 1443 kg more than 1968 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 GMC Yukon (509 Nm) has 351 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm). This means 2005 GMC Yukon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2005 GMC Yukon | 1968 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | GMC | Triumph |
Model | Yukon | 2000 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5965 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 336 HP | 89 HP |
Torque | 509 Nm | 158 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 9.3:1 |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2613 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5580 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1930 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 64 L |