2005 GMC Yukon vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 GMC Yukon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 GMC Yukon would be higher. At 5,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 GMC Yukon (335 HP) has 158 more horse power than 2010 Ford E-350. (177 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 GMC Yukon should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford E-350.
Because 2005 GMC Yukon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Ford E-350. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 GMC Yukon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 GMC Yukon (510 Nm) has 326 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford E-350. (184 Nm). This means 2005 GMC Yukon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford E-350.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 GMC Yukon | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
| Make | GMC | Ford |
| Model | Yukon | E-350 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
| Body Type | SUV | Van |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5965 cc | 5400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 335 HP | 177 HP |
| Torque | 510 Nm | 184 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4437 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1806 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2619 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.8 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 18.1 L/100km | 6.9 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 57 L |
