2005 GMC Yukon vs. 2012 Acura TL
To start off, 2012 Acura TL is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 GMC Yukon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 GMC Yukon would be higher. At 5,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 GMC Yukon (336 HP) has 31 more horse power than 2012 Acura TL. (305 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 GMC Yukon should accelerate faster than 2012 Acura TL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 GMC Yukon weights approximately 813 kg more than 2012 Acura TL. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 GMC Yukon (509 Nm) has 139 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Acura TL. (370 Nm). This means 2005 GMC Yukon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Acura TL.
Compare all specifications:
2005 GMC Yukon | 2012 Acura TL | |
Make | GMC | Acura |
Model | Yukon | TL |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5965 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 336 HP | 305 HP |
Torque | 509 Nm | 370 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2613 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5580 mm | 4928 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1930 mm | 1453 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2776 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.8 L/100km | 9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 18.1 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 70 L |