2005 GMC Yukon vs. 2012 Audi R8
To start off, 2012 Audi R8 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 GMC Yukon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 GMC Yukon would be higher. At 5,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi R8 (525 HP) has 190 more horse power than 2005 GMC Yukon. (335 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi R8 should accelerate faster than 2005 GMC Yukon.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi R8 (530 Nm) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 GMC Yukon. (510 Nm). This means 2012 Audi R8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 GMC Yukon.
Compare all specifications:
2005 GMC Yukon | 2012 Audi R8 | |
Make | GMC | Audi |
Model | Yukon | R8 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 5965 cc | 5200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 335 HP | 525 HP |
Torque | 510 Nm | 530 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4435 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1905 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1245 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2649 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.8 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 18.1 L/100km | 19.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 90 L |