2005 Holden Caprice vs. 1952 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2005 Holden Caprice is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,788 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Holden Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Holden Caprice (369 Nm) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Jaguar XK. (290 Nm). This means 2005 Holden Caprice will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Jaguar XK.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Holden Caprice | 1952 Jaguar XK | |
| Make | Holden | Jaguar |
| Model | Caprice | XK |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3788 cc | 3441 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 158 HP |
| Torque | 369 Nm | 290 Nm |
| Top Speed | 228 km/hour | 201 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
