2005 Holden Caprice vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2005 Holden Caprice is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 5,665 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Holden Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Holden Caprice (295 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 165 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (130 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Holden Caprice should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Holden Caprice (446 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 248 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (198 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2005 Holden Caprice will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Holden Caprice | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Holden | Triumph |
| Model | Caprice | 2000 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5665 cc | 2498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 295 HP | 130 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 446 Nm | 198 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 99 mm | 74.8 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 95 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
