2005 Holden Caprice vs. 1966 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 2005 Holden Caprice is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 3,788 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Holden Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2005 Holden Caprice is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Holden Caprice. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Riley Kestrel, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Holden Caprice (369 Nm) has 286 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Riley Kestrel. (83 Nm). This means 2005 Holden Caprice will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Holden Caprice | 1966 Riley Kestrel | |
| Make | Holden | Riley |
| Model | Caprice | Kestrel |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1966 |
| Engine Size | 3788 cc | 1098 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 53 HP |
| Torque | 369 Nm | 83 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
