2005 Holden Caprice vs. 1968 ZAZ 966
To start off, 2005 Holden Caprice is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 ZAZ 966 would be higher. At 3,788 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Holden Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Holden Caprice (369 Nm) has 317 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 ZAZ 966. (52 Nm). This means 2005 Holden Caprice will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 ZAZ 966.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Holden Caprice | 1968 ZAZ 966 | |
| Make | Holden | ZAZ |
| Model | Caprice | 966 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 3788 cc | 887 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 27 HP |
| Torque | 369 Nm | 52 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
