2005 Holden Caprice vs. 1970 Zastava 1300
To start off, 2005 Holden Caprice is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Holden Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Holden Caprice (502 Nm) has 409 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm). This means 2005 Holden Caprice will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Zastava 1300. 2005 Holden Caprice has automatic transmission and 1970 Zastava 1300 has manual transmission. 1970 Zastava 1300 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Holden Caprice will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Holden Caprice | 1970 Zastava 1300 | |
| Make | Holden | Zastava |
| Model | Caprice | 1300 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1970 |
| Engine Size | 3791 cc | 1295 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 53 HP |
| Torque | 502 Nm | 93 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
