2005 Holden Caprice vs. 1983 Matra-Simca Murena
To start off, 2005 Holden Caprice is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Matra-Simca Murena. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Matra-Simca Murena would be higher. At 5,665 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Holden Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Holden Caprice (295 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 155 more horse power than 1983 Matra-Simca Murena. (140 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Holden Caprice should accelerate faster than 1983 Matra-Simca Murena.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2005 Holden Caprice has automatic transmission and 1983 Matra-Simca Murena has manual transmission. 1983 Matra-Simca Murena will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Holden Caprice will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Holden Caprice | 1983 Matra-Simca Murena | |
| Make | Holden | Matra-Simca |
| Model | Caprice | Murena |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1983 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5665 cc | 2154 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 295 HP | 140 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 99 mm | 91.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 81.6 mm |
| Top Speed | 250 km/hour | 210 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
