2005 Holden Caprice vs. 1983 Suzuki Alto
To start off, 2005 Holden Caprice is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Suzuki Alto. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Suzuki Alto would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Holden Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2005 Holden Caprice is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Holden Caprice. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Suzuki Alto, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Holden Caprice (502 Nm) has 443 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Suzuki Alto. (59 Nm). This means 2005 Holden Caprice will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Suzuki Alto.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Holden Caprice | 1983 Suzuki Alto | |
Make | Holden | Suzuki |
Model | Caprice | Alto |
Year Released | 2005 | 1983 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 39 HP |
Torque | 502 Nm | 59 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |