2005 Holden Caprice vs. 2002 Lotec C 1000
To start off, 2005 Holden Caprice is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Lotec C 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Lotec C 1000 would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm) has 621 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Holden Caprice. (369 Nm). This means 2002 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Holden Caprice. 2005 Holden Caprice has automatic transmission and 2002 Lotec C 1000 has manual transmission. 2002 Lotec C 1000 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Holden Caprice will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Holden Caprice | 2002 Lotec C 1000 | |
| Make | Holden | Lotec |
| Model | Caprice | C 1000 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 3788 cc | 5500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 843 HP |
| Torque | 369 Nm | 990 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
