2005 Holden Combo vs. 1970 Renault 8
To start off, 2005 Holden Combo is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Renault 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Renault 8 would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Holden Combo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Holden Combo (86 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1970 Renault 8. (49 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Holden Combo should accelerate faster than 1970 Renault 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Holden Combo weights approximately 420 kg more than 1970 Renault 8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1970 Renault 8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Renault 8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Holden Combo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Holden Combo | 1970 Renault 8 | |
Make | Holden | Renault |
Model | Combo | 8 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1107 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 780 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2270 mm |