2005 Holden Combo vs. 1994 Nissan Presea
To start off, 2005 Holden Combo is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Nissan Presea. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Nissan Presea would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Holden Combo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Nissan Presea (93 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2005 Holden Combo. (86 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Nissan Presea should accelerate faster than 2005 Holden Combo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Holden Combo weights approximately 210 kg more than 1994 Nissan Presea.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Holden Combo (133 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Nissan Presea. (125 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2005 Holden Combo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Nissan Presea.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Holden Combo | 1994 Nissan Presea | |
| Make | Holden | Nissan |
| Model | Combo | Presea |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 86 HP | 93 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 133 Nm | 125 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 990 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 4400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2510 mm |
