2005 Holden Combo vs. 2012 Nissan Versa
To start off, 2012 Nissan Versa is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Holden Combo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Holden Combo would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Nissan Versa is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Nissan Versa (122 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 2005 Holden Combo. (86 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Versa should accelerate faster than 2005 Holden Combo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Nissan Versa weights approximately 51 kg more than 2005 Holden Combo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Nissan Versa (172 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Holden Combo. (133 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2012 Nissan Versa will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Holden Combo.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Holden Combo | 2012 Nissan Versa | |
Make | Holden | Nissan |
Model | Combo | Versa |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 86 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 172 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1251 kg |