2005 Holden Jackaroo vs. 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk
To start off, 2005 Holden Jackaroo is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 4,735 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Holden Jackaroo (213 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk. (209 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Holden Jackaroo should accelerate faster than 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Holden Jackaroo weights approximately 470 kg more than 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk (396 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Holden Jackaroo. (310 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Holden Jackaroo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Holden Jackaroo | 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk | |
| Make | Holden | Studebaker |
| Model | Jackaroo | Sky Hawk |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3494 cc | 4735 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 213 HP | 209 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 310 Nm | 396 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1920 kg | 1450 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 5150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2980 mm |
