2005 Holden Jackaroo vs. 1961 Reliant Sabre Six
To start off, 2005 Holden Jackaroo is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Reliant Sabre Six. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Reliant Sabre Six would be higher. At 3,494 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Holden Jackaroo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Holden Jackaroo (213 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 1961 Reliant Sabre Six. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Holden Jackaroo should accelerate faster than 1961 Reliant Sabre Six. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Holden Jackaroo weights approximately 1104 kg more than 1961 Reliant Sabre Six. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Holden Jackaroo (310 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 124 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Reliant Sabre Six. (186 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2005 Holden Jackaroo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Reliant Sabre Six.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Holden Jackaroo | 1961 Reliant Sabre Six | |
| Make | Holden | Reliant |
| Model | Jackaroo | Sabre Six |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1961 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3494 cc | 2553 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 213 HP | 109 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 310 Nm | 186 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1920 kg | 816 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1560 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1280 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2290 mm |
