2005 Holden Jackaroo vs. 1963 Holden EJ
To start off, 2005 Holden Jackaroo is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 3,494 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Holden Jackaroo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Holden Jackaroo (213 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 149 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Holden Jackaroo should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Holden Jackaroo weights approximately 786 kg more than 1963 Holden EJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Holden Jackaroo (310 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 147 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Holden EJ. (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM). This means 2005 Holden Jackaroo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Holden EJ.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Holden Jackaroo | 1963 Holden EJ | |
| Make | Holden | Holden |
| Model | Jackaroo | EJ |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3494 cc | 2262 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 213 HP | 64 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 310 Nm | 163 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1920 kg | 1134 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2680 mm |
