2005 Holden Rodeo vs. 1963 Zastava 1300
To start off, 2005 Holden Rodeo is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 2,405 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Holden Rodeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Holden Rodeo (93 HP) has 40 more horse power than 1963 Zastava 1300. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Holden Rodeo should accelerate faster than 1963 Zastava 1300.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Holden Rodeo (207 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 114 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2005 Holden Rodeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Zastava 1300.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Holden Rodeo | 1963 Zastava 1300 | |
Make | Holden | Zastava |
Model | Rodeo | 1300 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
Engine Size | 2405 cc | 1295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 207 Nm | 93 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2430 mm |