2005 Holden Rodeo vs. 1982 Talbot 1510
To start off, 2005 Holden Rodeo is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Talbot 1510. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Talbot 1510 would be higher. At 2,405 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Holden Rodeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Holden Rodeo (93 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1982 Talbot 1510. (66 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Holden Rodeo should accelerate faster than 1982 Talbot 1510.
Because 2005 Holden Rodeo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Holden Rodeo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Talbot 1510, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Holden Rodeo (207 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Talbot 1510. (108 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2005 Holden Rodeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Talbot 1510.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Holden Rodeo | 1982 Talbot 1510 | |
Make | Holden | Talbot |
Model | Rodeo | 1510 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2405 cc | 1293 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 66 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 207 Nm | 108 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2610 mm |