2005 Holden Rodeo vs. 1996 Renault Megane
To start off, 2005 Holden Rodeo is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Renault Megane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Renault Megane would be higher. At 2,405 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Holden Rodeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Holden Rodeo (93 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1996 Renault Megane. (73 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Holden Rodeo should accelerate faster than 1996 Renault Megane.
Because 2005 Holden Rodeo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Holden Rodeo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Holden Rodeo (207 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Renault Megane. (130 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2005 Holden Rodeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Renault Megane.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Holden Rodeo | 1996 Renault Megane | |
Make | Holden | Renault |
Model | Rodeo | Megane |
Year Released | 2005 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2405 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 73 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 207 Nm | 130 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2470 mm |