2005 Holden Rodeo vs. 1998 Acura EL
To start off, 2005 Holden Rodeo is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Acura EL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Acura EL would be higher. At 2,405 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Holden Rodeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Acura EL (127 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 2005 Holden Rodeo. (93 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Acura EL should accelerate faster than 2005 Holden Rodeo.
Because 2005 Holden Rodeo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Holden Rodeo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Acura EL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Holden Rodeo (207 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Acura EL. (145 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 2005 Holden Rodeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Acura EL.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Holden Rodeo | 1998 Acura EL | |
| Make | Holden | Acura |
| Model | Rodeo | EL |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2405 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 127 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6600 RPM |
| Torque | 207 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4478 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1704 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1394 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2619 mm |
