2005 Holden Rodeo vs. 2003 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2005 Holden Rodeo is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Nissan X-Trail. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Nissan X-Trail would be higher. At 2,405 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Holden Rodeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Nissan X-Trail (112 HP @ 2000 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 2005 Holden Rodeo. (93 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 2005 Holden Rodeo.
Because 2003 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Holden Rodeo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Nissan X-Trail (270 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Holden Rodeo. (207 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2003 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Holden Rodeo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Holden Rodeo | 2003 Nissan X-Trail | |
| Make | Holden | Nissan |
| Model | Rodeo | X-Trail |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2405 cc | 2184 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 112 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Torque | 207 Nm | 270 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2540 mm |
